Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Mazhar Baqa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. All though the arguments for deletion are very weak, because expecting for find relevant sources for arabic books about Islam on the net available to us is not reasonable, still we cannot keep thiswithout some kind of better source. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Muhammad Mazhar Baqa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this academic certainly exists, I don't think from what I can see that he quite meets our notability standards for academics. Others are encouraged to find more sources than I was able to find. Tagged by another editor for notability since March 2010. Epeefleche (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Associate Professor and no apparent coverage in independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 00:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Added Urdu. Hits indicate the same lack of third-party coverage in print. This subject appears to fail WP:ACADEMIC/WP:AUTHOR. JFHJr (㊟) 02:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per above. Lack of third party coverage to establish notability. JoshyDinda (talk) 14:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability of GNG. --Cox wasan (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.